Jim Robison
Hi Mike,
Thank you for reminding me of “The Folde,” coffee houses, and beatnik emulants (Is that a word? My spellchecker says not). I don’t recite weird poetry anymore, but I do have “The Coffee House” station preset on my Sirius XM.
The great constitutional debate, as I recall, went something like this: In the US constitution, government derives it’s power from the people. A student body constitution should, therefore, derive power from the students. But, in fact, the students had very little power to share, because in high school all power was held by the administration. The argument against the proposed constitution was that it did not acknowledge the power relationship between the student body and the administration. It was like King George retaining power over the colonies, despite our new constitution.
Coincidentally, at the same time we were debating the pros and cons of the constitution, the administration announced some ruling about how low the back neckline could be on girls blouses. Shouldn’t dress code be a student body (no pun intended) decision? So, as I recall, it was the dress code proclamation that killed the constitution.
I’m sure there is much more to this story. Can anyone else help us out here?
​Jim
|